BELLON v. NEVEN, 2:12-cv-01639-PMP-GWF. (2013)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20130709b82
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jul. 08, 2013
Latest Update: Jul. 08, 2013
Summary: ORDER PHILIP M. PRO, District Judge. This is an action on a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. Petitioner, appearing without counsel, filed a response to the Court's order directing him to offer evidence and arguments why his petition should not be dismissed as untimely. ECF No. 8. Based on a preliminary review of those arguments and the petition the Court determined to appoint counsel. ECF No. 9. Counsel has been charged with making an investigation and providing
Summary: ORDER PHILIP M. PRO, District Judge. This is an action on a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. Petitioner, appearing without counsel, filed a response to the Court's order directing him to offer evidence and arguments why his petition should not be dismissed as untimely. ECF No. 8. Based on a preliminary review of those arguments and the petition the Court determined to appoint counsel. ECF No. 9. Counsel has been charged with making an investigation and providing ..
More
ORDER
PHILIP M. PRO, District Judge.
This is an action on a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner, appearing without counsel, filed a response to the Court's order directing him to offer evidence and arguments why his petition should not be dismissed as untimely. ECF No. 8. Based on a preliminary review of those arguments and the petition the Court determined to appoint counsel. ECF No. 9. Counsel has been charged with making an investigation and providing the Court with evidence and argument related to the timeliness of this petition.
Therefore, the Motion To Not Dismiss Appeal (ECF No. 8) is rendered moot. It is therefore denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
