Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

MORRIS v. BAKER, 3:14-cv-000372-LRH-WGC. (2014)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20141031d18 Visitors: 5
Filed: Oct. 29, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 29, 2014
Summary: ORDER LARRY R. HICKS, District Judge. This action is a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 by a Nevada state prisoner. Petitioner has paid the filing fee for this action. (ECF No. 1). The Court has reviewed the habeas petition, and it shall be served on respondents. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Clerk shall ELECTRONICALLY SERVE the petition (ECF No. 2) upon the respondents. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents shall have forty-five (45)
More

ORDER

LARRY R. HICKS, District Judge.

This action is a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 by a Nevada state prisoner. Petitioner has paid the filing fee for this action. (ECF No. 1). The Court has reviewed the habeas petition, and it shall be served on respondents.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Clerk shall ELECTRONICALLY SERVE the petition (ECF No. 2) upon the respondents.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents shall have forty-five (45) days from entry of this order within which to answer, or otherwise respond to, the petition. In their answer or other response, respondents shall address all claims presented in the petition. Respondents shall raise all potential affirmative defenses in the initial responsive pleading, including lack of exhaustion and procedural default. Successive motions to dismiss will not be entertained. If an answer is filed, respondents shall comply with the requirements of Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Proceedings in the United States District Courts under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. If an answer is filed, petitioner shall have forty-five (45) days from the date of service of the answer to file a reply.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any state court record exhibits filed by respondents shall be filed with a separate index of exhibits identifying the exhibits by number or letter. The hard copy of all state court record exhibits shall be forwarded, for this case, to the staff attorneys in the Reno Division of the Clerk of Court. The hard copy of all exhibits submitted to the Court shall be tabbed and shall be bound along the top edge of the pages.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, henceforth, petitioner shall serve upon the Attorney General of the State of Nevada a copy of every pleading, motion, or other document he submits for consideration by the Court. Petitioner shall include with the original paper submitted for filing a certificate stating the date that a true and correct copy of the document was mailed to the Attorney General. The Court may disregard any paper that does not include a certificate of service. After respondents appear in this action, petitioner shall make such service upon the particular Deputy Attorney General assigned to the case.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer