HONE v. STATE, 248. (2015)
Court: Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Number: innmco20150615289
Visitors: 9
Filed: May 20, 2015
Latest Update: May 20, 2015
Summary: This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. MEMORANDUM OPINION WECHSLER , Judge . {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reaso
Summary: This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. MEMORANDUM OPINION WECHSLER , Judge . {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reason..
More
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WECHSLER, Judge.
{1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
{2} Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated in our calendar notice.
{3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge and J. MILES HANISEE, Judge, concurs.
Source: Leagle
