MEADOWS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, 2:14-cv-2188. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20150608799
Visitors: 6
Filed: May 18, 2015
Latest Update: May 18, 2015
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO THE MOTIONS TO DISMISS ORDER JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b) and Local Rule 6-2 of the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada, Tracy Meadows, as the Representative of the Estate of D'Andre Berghardt, Jr., the Plaintiff, and Defendant United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management ("BLM") respectfully submit this joint stipulation extending u
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO THE MOTIONS TO DISMISS ORDER JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b) and Local Rule 6-2 of the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada, Tracy Meadows, as the Representative of the Estate of D'Andre Berghardt, Jr., the Plaintiff, and Defendant United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management ("BLM") respectfully submit this joint stipulation extending un..
More
JOINT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO THE MOTIONS TO DISMISS
ORDER
JENNIFER A. DORSEY, District Judge.
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b) and Local Rule 6-2 of the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada, Tracy Meadows, as the Representative of the Estate of D'Andre Berghardt, Jr., the Plaintiff, and Defendant United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management ("BLM") respectfully submit this joint stipulation extending until May 22, 2015, the filing deadline for Plaintiff to respond to the Motions to Dismiss filed by Defendants. The parties respectfully state as follows:
1. The United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management filed their Motion to Dismiss on April 28, 2015.
2. The Individual Defendants (Brian Loftin and Meagen Martin) filed their Partial Motion to Dismiss on April 28, 2015.
3. The parties agree that judicial economy and the orderly resolution of this action will be promoted if Plaintiff is given a one (1) week extension to respond.
4. Accordingly, the parties stipulate that Plaintiff will file her responses to Defendants Motions to Dismiss on or before May 22, 2015.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
