Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Schwartz-Tallard v. HSBC Bank USA, National Association, 2:17-cv-02328-RFB-NJK. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20181016d37 Visitors: 10
Filed: Oct. 15, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 15, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFF TO REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . This Stipulation to Extend Deadline for Plaintiff to reply to Defendant's Opposition to Motion for Preliminary Injnction is entered into as of the date below by and between HSBC Bank USA, National Association, (HSBC); Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells Fargo"); and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. "Wells Fargo", together with HSBC, Defe
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFF TO REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

This Stipulation to Extend Deadline for Plaintiff to reply to Defendant's Opposition to Motion for Preliminary Injnction is entered into as of the date below by and between HSBC Bank USA, National Association, (HSBC); Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells Fargo"); and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. "Wells Fargo", together with HSBC, Defendants", By and through their counsel, Snell & Wilmer L.L.P., and Irene Michelle Schwartz-Tallard ("Plaintiff') and together with Defendants, (the Parties"), hereby stipulate to extend the deadline for Plaintiff to file said pleading from October 12, 2018 to October 19, 2018.

This is the parties first request for an extension of time and is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party. The reason for the extension is to give the Plaintiff more time to evaluate and respond to the points and authorities set forth in the Opposition to Motion for Preliminary Injunction.

WHEREAS the parties stipulate and agree as follows:

Plaintiff shall have until October 19, 2018 to reply to Defendants' Opposition to Motion for Preliminary Injunction.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadline for Plaintiff to respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss shall be October 19, 2018.

IT IS SO ORDERED, nun pro tunc.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer