Hunter v. Cellco Partnership, Inc., 18-1431. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20190612e40
Visitors: 18
Filed: Jun. 11, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 11, 2019
Summary: ORDER JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL , District Judge . AND NOW, this 11th day of June, 2019, it is ORDERED that: 1. The defendant's motion to dismiss Count I, II and III of the Complaint to the extent these counts seek recovery of severance benefits [Doc. 2] is GRANTED. 2. Counts I, II and III seeking severance benefits are DISMISSED with prejudice. 3. Since the parties have already consented to arbitrate Plaintiff's claims in Counts I, II and III for long-term incentive awards [ECF 11], th
Summary: ORDER JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL , District Judge . AND NOW, this 11th day of June, 2019, it is ORDERED that: 1. The defendant's motion to dismiss Count I, II and III of the Complaint to the extent these counts seek recovery of severance benefits [Doc. 2] is GRANTED. 2. Counts I, II and III seeking severance benefits are DISMISSED with prejudice. 3. Since the parties have already consented to arbitrate Plaintiff's claims in Counts I, II and III for long-term incentive awards [ECF 11], tho..
More
ORDER
JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 11th day of June, 2019, it is ORDERED that:
1. The defendant's motion to dismiss Count I, II and III of the Complaint to the extent these counts seek recovery of severance benefits [Doc. 2] is GRANTED.
2. Counts I, II and III seeking severance benefits are DISMISSED with prejudice.
3. Since the parties have already consented to arbitrate Plaintiff's claims in Counts I, II and III for long-term incentive awards [ECF 11], those claims are also DISMISSED with prejudice.
4. The Clerk is DIRECTED to mark this case terminated.
Source: Leagle
