KIDDER v. INTEL CORPORATION, 13-391 KG/CEG. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. New Mexico
Number: infdco20150420a38
Visitors: 14
Filed: Apr. 13, 2015
Latest Update: Apr. 13, 2015
Summary: ORDER KENNETH J. GONZALES , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court upon Defendant's Amended Motion in Limine, filed on July 8, 2014. (Doc. 62). Defendant seeks to exclude statements made to Plaintiff by Abad Valdez as hearsay. On July 14, 2014, in ruling on Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 45), the Court determined that the Valdez statements were not hearsay and were, therefore, admissible. (Doc. 72) at 8. Because the Court has already ruled on the subject of the A
Summary: ORDER KENNETH J. GONZALES , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court upon Defendant's Amended Motion in Limine, filed on July 8, 2014. (Doc. 62). Defendant seeks to exclude statements made to Plaintiff by Abad Valdez as hearsay. On July 14, 2014, in ruling on Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 45), the Court determined that the Valdez statements were not hearsay and were, therefore, admissible. (Doc. 72) at 8. Because the Court has already ruled on the subject of the Am..
More
ORDER
KENNETH J. GONZALES, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court upon Defendant's Amended Motion in Limine, filed on July 8, 2014. (Doc. 62). Defendant seeks to exclude statements made to Plaintiff by Abad Valdez as hearsay. On July 14, 2014, in ruling on Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 45), the Court determined that the Valdez statements were not hearsay and were, therefore, admissible. (Doc. 72) at 8. Because the Court has already ruled on the subject of the Amended Motion in Limine, the Court denies the Amended Motion in Limine as moot.
IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's Amended Motion in Limine (Doc. 62) is denied as moot.
Source: Leagle
