Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Opromollo v. Mandalay Corp., 2:17-cv-01409-RFB-VCF. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180820d45 Visitors: 27
Filed: Aug. 16, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 16, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE JOINT PRETRIAL ORDER (FIRST REQUEST) CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to Local Rules IA 6-1 and LR II 7-1 and 26-4, Plaintiff PAUL OPROMOLLO ("Plaintiff") and Defendant MANDALAY CORP. d/b/a MANDALAY BAY RESORT AND CASINO ("Defendant"), by and through their respective counsel, do hereby stipulate and agree to an extension to the deadline to file Joint Pretrial Order which is currently due on August 31, 2018 (30 days after the Motion for S
More

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE JOINT PRETRIAL ORDER

(FIRST REQUEST)

Pursuant to Local Rules IA 6-1 and LR II 7-1 and 26-4, Plaintiff PAUL OPROMOLLO ("Plaintiff") and Defendant MANDALAY CORP. d/b/a MANDALAY BAY RESORT AND CASINO ("Defendant"), by and through their respective counsel, do hereby stipulate and agree to an extension to the deadline to file Joint Pretrial Order which is currently due on August 31, 2018 (30 days after the Motion for Summary Judgment ruling (ECF No. 48) per LR II 26-1(5)). The parties agree to an extension of ninety (90) days, up to and including Thursday, November 29, 2018. This is the first stipulation for an extension of time to file the Joint Pretrial Order.

This Stipulation is supported by good cause as required by LR II 26-4, as the parties have agreed to participate in a judicial settlement conference. A Stipulation requesting that a settlement conference be scheduled by this Court is being filed concurrently herewith. This Stipulation is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer