Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. James, 3:16-cr-00027-MMD-VPC. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20161024b11 Visitors: 9
Filed: Oct. 20, 2016
Latest Update: Oct. 20, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE (Doc. No. 28) (First Request) MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and through DANIEL G. BOGDEN, United States Attorney, SHANNON M. BRYANT, Assistant United States Attorney; LAUREN D. GORMAN, Assistant Federal Public Defender, counsel for Defendant, CHRISTOPHER JAMES, that the deadline for the government's response to the Motion to Suppress Evidence [Doc. No. 28], which is currentl
More

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE (Doc. No. 28)

(First Request)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and through DANIEL G. BOGDEN, United States Attorney, SHANNON M. BRYANT, Assistant United States Attorney; LAUREN D. GORMAN, Assistant Federal Public Defender, counsel for Defendant, CHRISTOPHER JAMES, that the deadline for the government's response to the Motion to Suppress Evidence [Doc. No. 28], which is currently October 21, 2016, be continued to November 2, 2016.

This Stipulation is entered into for the following reasons:

1. Counsel for the United States of America was out of office and outside of the continental United States from October 6, 2016 until October 19, 2016, when he returned to the office. The instant Motion was filed on October 7, 2016 during counsel's absence. Counsel for the United States of America has therefore been unable to prepare a timely response to Defendant's Motion and requires the additional time to do so.

2. Denial of this continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice.

3. This is the first request to extend the deadline for the government's response to the Motion to Suppress Evidence [Doc. No. 28], in the above-captioned matter.

FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER

FINDINGS OF FACTS AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

Based on the pending Stipulation of counsel, and good cause appearing, the Court finds that:

1. Counsel for the United States of America was out of office on leave from October 6, 2016 until October 19, 2016, when he returned to work. Defendant's Motion was filed on October 7, 2016, during counsel's absence, and the government has been unable to prepare a timely response to the Motion and requires additional time to do so.

2. Denial of this continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice.

3. This is the first request to extend the deadline for the government's response to the Motion to Suppress Evidence [Doc. No. 28], in the above-captioned matter.

4. For all the above-stated reasons, the ends of justice would be served by granting an order that the deadline to file government's response to the Motion to Suppress Evidence [Doc. No. 28], which is currently October 21, 2016, be extended to November 2, 2016.

ORDER

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the government's response to the Motion to Suppress Evidence [Doc. No. 28], which is currently October 21, 2016, be continued to November 2, 2016.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer