Chien-Kang Chen v. Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company, 2:18-cv-02157-JCM-PAL. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20181219e21
Visitors: 14
Filed: Dec. 18, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 18, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . IT HEREBY IS STIPULATED AND AGREED between Plaintiffs Chien-Kang Chen and Ya Wen by and through their attorneys of record of the Lin Law Group and Defendant Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company by and through its' attorneys of record of McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth LLP will grant Plaintiffs' counsel a second two-week extension to file a response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative, To Stay Action. That couns
Summary: STIPULATION JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . IT HEREBY IS STIPULATED AND AGREED between Plaintiffs Chien-Kang Chen and Ya Wen by and through their attorneys of record of the Lin Law Group and Defendant Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company by and through its' attorneys of record of McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth LLP will grant Plaintiffs' counsel a second two-week extension to file a response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative, To Stay Action. That counse..
More
STIPULATION
JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge.
IT HEREBY IS STIPULATED AND AGREED between Plaintiffs Chien-Kang Chen and Ya Wen by and through their attorneys of record of the Lin Law Group and Defendant Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company by and through its' attorneys of record of McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth LLP will grant Plaintiffs' counsel a second two-week extension to file a response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative, To Stay Action. That counsels have mutually agreed that Plaintiffs' response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative, To Stay Action shall be file in the above court no later than by 5:00 pm PST on the 28th day of December 2018.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
