ROBERT C. JONES, District Judge.
Respondents move this Court for an enlargement of time of thirty (30) days from the current due date of October 14, 2019, up to and including Wednesday, November 13, 2019, in which to file their reply to Petitioner's response in opposition to Respondents' motion to dismiss. ECF Nos. 52, 74. This motion is made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b) and Rule 6-1 of the Local Rules of Practice and is based upon the attached affidavit of counsel.
This is the second enlargement of time sought by Respondents and is brought in good faith and not for the purpose of delay.
I, Allison Herr, being first duly sworn under oath, depose and state as follows:
1. I am an attorney licensed to practice law in all courts within the State of Nevada, and am employed as a Senior Deputy Attorney General in the Office of the Nevada Attorney General. I have been assigned to represent Respondents in the case of Michael Smith v. Renee Baker, et al., Case No. 3:13-cv-00246-RCJ-WGC, and as such, have personal knowledge of the matters contained herein.
2. A reply to Petitioner's opposition to the motion to dismiss (ECF No. 74) is currently due on Monday, October 14, 2019.
3. I have been unable with due diligence to timely complete the response herein. Additional time is needed to draft responsive pleadings and have those pleadings reviewed and approved by my supervisor. I am seeking an extension of time to Wednesday, November 13, 2019.
4. This is my second request for an extension. I under estimated the amount of time needed to complete the reply in this matter, and I had a family emergency that necessitated out of state travel. As a result of this combination of events I have been unable to complete the reply despite exercising due diligence. Consequently I am seeking an additional thirty day extension in this matter.
5. This is the second request for an extension in this case. I have conferred with counsel for the Petitioner, Amelia Bizzaro, and she does not oppose my request.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on this 11
IT IS SO ORDERED.