Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

FLORES v. CHELSEA BAGEL & CAFE INC., 14CV1911-LTS-SN. (2014)

Court: District Court, S.D. New York Number: infdco20141120e81 Visitors: 5
Filed: Nov. 18, 2014
Latest Update: Nov. 18, 2014
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, District Judge. The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Netburn's July 30, 2014, Report and Recommendation (the "Report"), which recommends that the Court approve the settlement agreement reached by the parties in this case, which was originally brought by plaintiffs under the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"), 29 U.S.C. 201 et seq. , and the New York State Labor Law for failure to pay minimum wages and overtime compensation. Judg
More

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, District Judge.

The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Netburn's July 30, 2014, Report and Recommendation (the "Report"), which recommends that the Court approve the settlement agreement reached by the parties in this case, which was originally brought by plaintiffs under the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., and the New York State Labor Law for failure to pay minimum wages and overtime compensation. Judge Netburn has carefully scrutinized the settlement agreement, and recommends approval on the basis that it constitutes a fair and reasonable resolution of a bona fide FLSA dispute. The Court has received no objections to the Report.

When reviewing a report and recommendation, the Court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate." 28 U.S.C.S. § 636(b)(1) (C) (LexisNexis 20 14). "To accept the report and recommendation of a magistrate, to which no timely objection has been made, a district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record." Wilds v. United Parcel Service. Inc., 262 F.Supp.2d 163, 169 (S.D.N.Y. 2003) (internal citations and quotation marks omitted)).

Having carefully reviewed Magistrate Judge Netburn's Report, the Court finds no clear error. Therefore, the Court adopts the Report in its entirety. The parties' settlement agreement is approved.

The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962).

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer