GUERNON v. CROSSMARK, INC., 11-cv-67-JL. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. New Hampshire
Number: infdco20120323h45
Visitors: 17
Filed: Mar. 22, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 22, 2012
Summary: ORDER JOSEPH N. LAPLANTE, District Judge. The court has undertaken active consideration of Crossmark, Inc.'s motion for summary judgment (document no. 22) and the plaintiff's motion to amend (document no. 24). If there is any reason that the court should not actively consider the motions at this time (such as an imminent settlement or planned, potentially successful mediation), counsel are requested to immediately notify the Deputy Clerk. If the Deputy Clerk is not so informed by March 29, 2
Summary: ORDER JOSEPH N. LAPLANTE, District Judge. The court has undertaken active consideration of Crossmark, Inc.'s motion for summary judgment (document no. 22) and the plaintiff's motion to amend (document no. 24). If there is any reason that the court should not actively consider the motions at this time (such as an imminent settlement or planned, potentially successful mediation), counsel are requested to immediately notify the Deputy Clerk. If the Deputy Clerk is not so informed by March 29, 20..
More
ORDER
JOSEPH N. LAPLANTE, District Judge.
The court has undertaken active consideration of Crossmark, Inc.'s motion for summary judgment (document no. 22) and the plaintiff's motion to amend (document no. 24). If there is any reason that the court should not actively consider the motions at this time (such as an imminent settlement or planned, potentially successful mediation), counsel are requested to immediately notify the Deputy Clerk. If the Deputy Clerk is not so informed by March 29, 2012, a hearing will be scheduled.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
