U.S. v. Hampton, 1:05-CR-163. (2016)
Court: District Court, W.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20160523920
Visitors: 9
Filed: May 20, 2016
Latest Update: May 20, 2016
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ROBERT HOLMES BELL , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on defendant's Motion for Modification or Reduction of Sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2), (ECF 1030). Based on a review of defendant's motion, the Sentence Modification Report, submission by counsel on behalf of the defendant, and the original criminal file, the Court has determined that the motion should be denied. The Court finds the defendant ineligible for a reduction of sentenc
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ROBERT HOLMES BELL , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on defendant's Motion for Modification or Reduction of Sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2), (ECF 1030). Based on a review of defendant's motion, the Sentence Modification Report, submission by counsel on behalf of the defendant, and the original criminal file, the Court has determined that the motion should be denied. The Court finds the defendant ineligible for a reduction of sentence..
More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ROBERT HOLMES BELL, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendant's Motion for Modification or Reduction of Sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), (ECF 1030). Based on a review of defendant's motion, the Sentence Modification Report, submission by counsel on behalf of the defendant, and the original criminal file, the Court has determined that the motion should be denied. The Court finds the defendant ineligible for a reduction of sentence due to the quantity used to drive the guideline exceeds 4,500 grams and the new calculation does not result in a lower guideline range.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Hampton's Motion for Reduction of Sentence (ECF No. 1030) is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
