J. Bruce Alverson, Ltd. v. Nortek, Inc., 2:15-cv-02141-GMN-CWH. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20160309h79
Visitors: 23
Filed: Mar. 07, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 07, 2016
Summary: ORDER C. W. HOFFMAN, Jr. , Magistrate Judge . Presently before the Court is Defendant Nortek, Inc.'s Motion to Stay Discovery (ECF No. 15), filed on February 16, 2016. Plaintiff J. Bruce Alverson, Ltd. does not oppose the motion. (ECF No. 16). The Court finds that good cause exists to stay discovery pending resolution of the motion to dismiss (ECF No. 5). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant Nortek, Inc.'s Motion to Stay Discovery (ECF No. 15) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if
Summary: ORDER C. W. HOFFMAN, Jr. , Magistrate Judge . Presently before the Court is Defendant Nortek, Inc.'s Motion to Stay Discovery (ECF No. 15), filed on February 16, 2016. Plaintiff J. Bruce Alverson, Ltd. does not oppose the motion. (ECF No. 16). The Court finds that good cause exists to stay discovery pending resolution of the motion to dismiss (ECF No. 5). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant Nortek, Inc.'s Motion to Stay Discovery (ECF No. 15) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if t..
More
ORDER
C. W. HOFFMAN, Jr., Magistrate Judge.
Presently before the Court is Defendant Nortek, Inc.'s Motion to Stay Discovery (ECF No. 15), filed on February 16, 2016. Plaintiff J. Bruce Alverson, Ltd. does not oppose the motion. (ECF No. 16). The Court finds that good cause exists to stay discovery pending resolution of the motion to dismiss (ECF No. 5).
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant Nortek, Inc.'s Motion to Stay Discovery (ECF No. 15) is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if the district judge denies the motion to dismiss (ECF No. 5), then the parties must meet and confer and file a proposed discovery plan and scheduling order within 14 days from the date of the order denying the motion to dismiss. The proposed discovery plan must comply with Local Rule 26-1(e), with discovery deadlines measured from the date of the order on the motion to dismiss.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties must file a joint status report 90 days from the date of this Order.
Source: Leagle
