Murphy v. AllStaff HomeCare, LLC, 16-cv-02370-WJM-MEH. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Colorado
Number: infdco20190522a22
Visitors: 7
Filed: Apr. 23, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 23, 2019
Summary: ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL E. HEGARTY , Magistrate Judge . This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. On April 19, 2019, this Court assisted the parties in efforts to resolve this case short of trial. To further those efforts, this Court finds good cause to stay all pre-trial proceedings temporarily until August 15, 2019. Such stay, however, may intrude upon the trial preparation conference and jury trial currently scheduled before the Honorable
Summary: ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL E. HEGARTY , Magistrate Judge . This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. On April 19, 2019, this Court assisted the parties in efforts to resolve this case short of trial. To further those efforts, this Court finds good cause to stay all pre-trial proceedings temporarily until August 15, 2019. Such stay, however, may intrude upon the trial preparation conference and jury trial currently scheduled before the Honorable ..
More
ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
MICHAEL E. HEGARTY, Magistrate Judge.
This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. On April 19, 2019, this Court assisted the parties in efforts to resolve this case short of trial. To further those efforts, this Court finds good cause to stay all pre-trial proceedings temporarily until August 15, 2019. Such stay, however, may intrude upon the trial preparation conference and jury trial currently scheduled before the Honorable William J. Martinez.
Accordingly, as the parties in this case currently desire to focus on their settlement efforts, this Court imposes a temporary stay of the proceedings until August 15, 2019. The parties shall file dismissal papers or a status report with the Court on or before that date. In addition, the Court respectfully RECOMMENDS that the Trial Preparation Conference set for October 11, 2019, and the jury trial set to commence October 28, 2019, be vacated and reset as Judge Martinez's calendar permits.1
FootNotes
1. Be advised that all parties shall have fourteen (14) days after service hereof to serve and file any written objections in order to obtain reconsideration by the District Judge to whom this case is assigned. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. The party filing objections must specifically identify those findings or recommendations to which the objections are being made. The District Court need not consider frivolous, conclusive or general objections. A party's failure to file such written objections to proposed findings and recommendations contained in this report may bar the party from a de novo determination by the District Judge of the proposed findings and recommendations. United States v. Raddatz, 447 U.S. 667, 676-83 (1980); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Additionally, the failure to file written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy may bar the aggrieved party from appealing the factual and legal findings of the Magistrate Judge that are accepted or adopted by the District Court. Duffield v. Jackson, 545 F.3d 1234, 1237 (10th Cir. 2008) (quoting Moore v. United States, 950 F.2d 656, 659 (10th Cir.1991)).
Source: Leagle
