CUMMINS v. GARCIA, 14-cv-0558 LH/SMV. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. New Mexico
Number: infdco20141202c23
Visitors: 6
Filed: Dec. 01, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 01, 2014
Summary: ORDER STEPHAN M. VIDMAR, Magistrate Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on Petitioner's [Second] Motion for Extension of Time to reply to his Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 23], filed on November 25, 2014. Petitioner explains that he needs an additional 60-90 days to formulate his reply because of his limited access to the prison facility's law library and because he has not received a copy of the audio recording of his state court jury trial, even though Respondents submitted the recor
Summary: ORDER STEPHAN M. VIDMAR, Magistrate Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on Petitioner's [Second] Motion for Extension of Time to reply to his Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 23], filed on November 25, 2014. Petitioner explains that he needs an additional 60-90 days to formulate his reply because of his limited access to the prison facility's law library and because he has not received a copy of the audio recording of his state court jury trial, even though Respondents submitted the record..
More
ORDER
STEPHAN M. VIDMAR, Magistrate Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Petitioner's [Second] Motion for Extension of Time to reply to his Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 23], filed on November 25, 2014. Petitioner explains that he needs an additional 60-90 days to formulate his reply because of his limited access to the prison facility's law library and because he has not received a copy of the audio recording of his state court jury trial, even though Respondents submitted the recording to the Court. [Doc. 23]. Respondents do not oppose the extension of time and do not respond to Petitioner's request for the audio recording. [Doc. 24].
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner's [Second] Motion for Extension of Time to reply to his Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 23] is GRANTED. Petitioner's reply is due by March 3, 2015.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondents produce a copy of the audio recording of the February 12-14, 2013 jury trial, see [Doc. 10], to Petitioner no later than December 31, 2014, or show cause why they should not be required to produce the recording.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
