Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

HERNANDEZ v. RETRIEVAL-MASTERS CREDITORS BUREAU, INC., 2:16-CV-02591-JCM-VCF. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20161122d26 Visitors: 17
Filed: Nov. 18, 2016
Latest Update: Nov. 18, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE ANSWER TO COMPLAINT [ECF NO. 1] FIRST REQUEST CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1 and 7-1, Plaintiff Jorge Hernandez ("Plaintiff"), and Defendant Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc. ("RCMB"), by and through their respective attorneys of record, stipulate as follows: STIPULATION 1. Plaintiff filed his Complaint on November 8, 2016 [ECF No. 1]. 2. RMCB recently retained counsel and a short extension is necessary
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE ANSWER TO COMPLAINT [ECF NO. 1]

FIRST REQUEST

Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1 and 7-1, Plaintiff Jorge Hernandez ("Plaintiff"), and Defendant Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc. ("RCMB"), by and through their respective attorneys of record, stipulate as follows:

STIPULATION

1. Plaintiff filed his Complaint on November 8, 2016 [ECF No. 1].

2. RMCB recently retained counsel and a short extension is necessary to allow RMCB's counsel to obtain the file and investigate the allegations in the Complaint before responding.

3. Plaintiff and RMCB also anticipate in engaging in settlement discussions on this case and wish to extend the deadline for RMCB to respond to the Complaint until December 16, 2016. This will allow the parties to continue settlement discussions without incurring additional fees and expenses.

4. RMCB requests additional time to file a response to the Complaint and Plaintiff does not object to the request.

5. Therefore, the parties agree that RMCB's response to the Complaint is now due on or before December 16, 2016.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer