NEW MEXICO TAXATION AND REVENUE DEPARTMENT v. EXERPLAY, INC., 33 (2014)
Court: Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Number: innmco20141218374
Visitors: 21
Filed: Nov. 13, 2014
Latest Update: Nov. 13, 2014
Summary: This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. MEMORANDUM OPINION VANZI, Judge. {1} Summary reversal was proposed for the reasons stated
Summary: This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. MEMORANDUM OPINION VANZI, Judge. {1} Summary reversal was proposed for the reasons stated i..
More
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
VANZI, Judge.
{1} Summary reversal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary reversal has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
{2} REVERSED.
{3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Chief Judge and J. MILES HANISEE, Judge, concurs.
Source: Leagle
