U.S. v. Nieto, 8:18CR267. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20190107841
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jan. 04, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 04, 2019
Summary: ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on defendant's Unopposed Motion to Extend Pretrial Motions Deadline [20]. For good cause shown, I find that the motion should be granted. The defendant will be given an approximate 60-day extension. Pretrial motions shall be filed by March 1, 2019. IT IS ORDERED: 1. Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Extend Pretrial Motions Deadline [20] is granted. Pretrial motions shall be filed on or before March 1, 2019. 2. The e
Summary: ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on defendant's Unopposed Motion to Extend Pretrial Motions Deadline [20]. For good cause shown, I find that the motion should be granted. The defendant will be given an approximate 60-day extension. Pretrial motions shall be filed by March 1, 2019. IT IS ORDERED: 1. Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Extend Pretrial Motions Deadline [20] is granted. Pretrial motions shall be filed on or before March 1, 2019. 2. The en..
More
ORDER
SUSAN M. BAZIS, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendant's Unopposed Motion to Extend Pretrial Motions Deadline [20]. For good cause shown, I find that the motion should be granted. The defendant will be given an approximate 60-day extension. Pretrial motions shall be filed by March 1, 2019.
IT IS ORDERED:
1. Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Extend Pretrial Motions Deadline [20] is granted. Pretrial motions shall be filed on or before March 1, 2019.
2. The ends of justice have been served by granting such motion and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The additional time arising as a result of the granting of the motion, i.e., the time between December 31, 2018 and March 1, 2019, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act for the reason defendant's counsel requires additional time to adequately prepare the case, taking into consideration due diligence of counsel, and the novelty and complexity of this case. The failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B).
Source: Leagle
