Dam v. Barr, 2:19-cv-01701-GMN-NJK. (2020)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20200312c32
Visitors: 9
Filed: Mar. 11, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 11, 2020
Summary: ORDER (Docket Nos. 12, 13, 14) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court are Plaintiffs' motions for extension of time of service for good cause, for an order granting extension of time for service, and for an order granting extension of time for service. Docket Nos. 12, 13, 14. Defendants failed to respond to the motion at Docket No. 12 by the deadline to do so. See Docket. That failure constitutes "a consent to the granting of the motion." See Local Rule 7-2(d). Ac
Summary: ORDER (Docket Nos. 12, 13, 14) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court are Plaintiffs' motions for extension of time of service for good cause, for an order granting extension of time for service, and for an order granting extension of time for service. Docket Nos. 12, 13, 14. Defendants failed to respond to the motion at Docket No. 12 by the deadline to do so. See Docket. That failure constitutes "a consent to the granting of the motion." See Local Rule 7-2(d). Acc..
More
ORDER
(Docket Nos. 12, 13, 14)
NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court are Plaintiffs' motions for extension of time of service for good cause, for an order granting extension of time for service, and for an order granting extension of time for service. Docket Nos. 12, 13, 14. Defendants failed to respond to the motion at Docket No. 12 by the deadline to do so. See Docket. That failure constitutes "a consent to the granting of the motion." See Local Rule 7-2(d). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the motion. Docket No. 12. The Court DENIES the motions at Docket Nos. 13 and 14 as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
