Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Sundell, 3:18-cv-0215-HDM-VPC. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180808c76 Visitors: 13
Filed: Aug. 06, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 06, 2018
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (ECF NO. 1) (THIRD REQUEST) HOWARD D. McKIBBEN , District Judge . COME NOW the parties, by and through their undersigned counsel of record, and hereby stipulate and agree that the time for Defendant to file his response to Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. 1), said response being due on August 6, 2018 ( See ECF No. 8), be extended until September 13, 2018. Reason for Extension As set forth in the
More

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (ECF NO. 1)

(THIRD REQUEST)

COME NOW the parties, by and through their undersigned counsel of record, and hereby stipulate and agree that the time for Defendant to file his response to Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. 1), said response being due on August 6, 2018 (See ECF No. 8), be extended until September 13, 2018.

Reason for Extension

As set forth in the parties' prior request (ECF Nos. 7 and 8), the parties are in settlement discussions. These discussions continue and, if successful, would obviate the need for Defendant to respond to the Complaint.

This stipulation is made in good faith and not for the purpose of unnecessarily delaying these proceedings. This is the third extension of time requested by counsel for filing Defendant's response to Plaintiff's Complaint.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer