U.S. v. FRIEND, CR 16-13-H-SEH. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Montana
Number: infdco20161222c50
Visitors: 13
Filed: Dec. 21, 2016
Latest Update: Dec. 21, 2016
Summary: ORDER SAM E. HADDON , District Judge . The United States has moved for an order allowing Deputy United States Marshal-Candidate Christopher Fay to testify at the hearing on December 23, 2016, by video conference. The motion is unopposed. ORDERED: 1. The United States' Unopposed Motion for Leave to Present Testimony Via Video Conferencing at Suppression Hearing 1 is GRANTED. Deputy United States Marshal-Candidate Christopher Fay may appear by video conference at the December 23, 2016, hea
Summary: ORDER SAM E. HADDON , District Judge . The United States has moved for an order allowing Deputy United States Marshal-Candidate Christopher Fay to testify at the hearing on December 23, 2016, by video conference. The motion is unopposed. ORDERED: 1. The United States' Unopposed Motion for Leave to Present Testimony Via Video Conferencing at Suppression Hearing 1 is GRANTED. Deputy United States Marshal-Candidate Christopher Fay may appear by video conference at the December 23, 2016, hear..
More
ORDER
SAM E. HADDON, District Judge.
The United States has moved for an order allowing Deputy United States Marshal-Candidate Christopher Fay to testify at the hearing on December 23, 2016, by video conference. The motion is unopposed.
ORDERED:
1. The United States' Unopposed Motion for Leave to Present Testimony Via Video Conferencing at Suppression Hearing1 is GRANTED. Deputy United States Marshal-Candidate Christopher Fay may appear by video conference at the December 23, 2016, hearing.
2. Counsel responsible for such appearance shall make all necessary video conference arrangements with Court systems staff by contacting the Systems Department in Butte, ((406) 497-1253). A successful video conference test must be conducted sufficiently in advance of the appearance to ensure that testing can be completed without imposition of unrealistic or inappropriate time and scheduling constraints upon systems personnel. The hearing will not be continued or interrupted if conferencing arrangements cannot be made or if the conference transmission signal is interrupted or lost.
FootNotes
1. Doc. 25.
Source: Leagle
