Filed: Nov. 04, 1994
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 39 F.3d 411 AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED ARTISTS PAYPHONE CORPORATION, United Artists Telecommunications, Inc., UA/Ranlee Joint Venture & UA/Ranlee, Inc., Defendants-Appellants, Ranlee Communications, Inc., Defendant. No. 762, Docket 94-7616. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued Nov. 2, 1994. Decided Nov. 4, 1994. Robert M. Peak, New York City (Jeffrey N. Leibell, Reboul, MacMurray, Hewitt, Maynard & Kristol, of counsel), for defendant
Summary: 39 F.3d 411 AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED ARTISTS PAYPHONE CORPORATION, United Artists Telecommunications, Inc., UA/Ranlee Joint Venture & UA/Ranlee, Inc., Defendants-Appellants, Ranlee Communications, Inc., Defendant. No. 762, Docket 94-7616. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued Nov. 2, 1994. Decided Nov. 4, 1994. Robert M. Peak, New York City (Jeffrey N. Leibell, Reboul, MacMurray, Hewitt, Maynard & Kristol, of counsel), for defendants..
More
39 F.3d 411
AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
UNITED ARTISTS PAYPHONE CORPORATION, United Artists
Telecommunications, Inc., UA/Ranlee Joint Venture
& UA/Ranlee, Inc., Defendants-Appellants,
Ranlee Communications, Inc., Defendant.
No. 762, Docket 94-7616.
United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.
Argued Nov. 2, 1994.
Decided Nov. 4, 1994.
Robert M. Peak, New York City (Jeffrey N. Leibell, Reboul, MacMurray, Hewitt, Maynard & Kristol, of counsel), for defendants-appellants.
Peter J. McHugh, New York City (Martin Domb, Hill, Betts & Nash, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellee.
Before: MESKILL, WINTER, and MAHONEY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
1
We affirm for substantially the reasons stated by Judge Leisure. American Tel. & Tel. Co. v. United Artists Payphone Corp., 852 F. Supp. 221 (S.D.N.Y.1994).
