Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. OTERO, 11-023 (SRC). (2012)

Court: District Court, D. New Jersey Number: infdco20120201a59 Visitors: 12
Filed: Jan. 31, 2012
Latest Update: Jan. 31, 2012
Summary: ORDER STANLEY R. CHESLER, District Judge. This matter having come before the Court on the joint application of the United States of America (Jacques S. Pierre and Lisa M. Colons, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, appearing), defendant Nelson Otero (Lorraine Gauli-Rufo and Peter Carter, Assistant Federal Public Defenders, appearing), and defendant Maxcime Cagan (Thomas Ambrosio, Esq., appearing), for an order pertaining to the transportation, examination, and oversight of certain pieces of ballistics
More

ORDER

STANLEY R. CHESLER, District Judge.

This matter having come before the Court on the joint application of the United States of America (Jacques S. Pierre and Lisa M. Colons, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, appearing), defendant Nelson Otero (Lorraine Gauli-Rufo and Peter Carter, Assistant Federal Public Defenders, appearing), and defendant Maxcime Cagan (Thomas Ambrosio, Esq., appearing), for an order pertaining to the transportation, examination, and oversight of certain pieces of ballistics evidence,

IT IS THE FINDING OF THIS COURT THAT:

1. Defense counsel have retained ballistics expert, Carl Leisinger, to examine and compare two shell casings recovered from the scene of the robbery of the Exxon Gas Station/Tiger Mart in Wayne, New Jersey, on May 10, 2010, with two shell casings test-fired from firearms recovered from the defendants;

2. The two shell casings recovered from the scene of the robbery are in the custody of the Federal Bureau of Investigation;

3. The two shell casings test-fired from firearms recovered from the defendants are in the custody of the New Jersey State Police, Ballistics Unit;

4. The Federal Bureau of Investigation has agreed to transport the two shell casings recovered from the scene of the robbery to Mr. Leisinger's office in Swing, New Jersey, at a mutually convenient date and time, for Mr. Leisinger to conduct his examination and comparison, provided that: (a) the defendants waive any objections to the chain of custody of the above-listed items of evidence from the time they are provided to Mr. Leisinger through and including the time they are in his possession; and (b) the Federal Bureau of Investigation be permitted to observe Mr. Leisinger as he handles the above-listed items of evidence to ensure their safe-keeping; and

5. The New Jersey State Police, Ballistics Unit, has agreed to transport the two shell casings test-fired from firearms recovered from the defendants to Mr. Leisinger's office in Ewing, New Jersey, at a mutually convenient date and time, for Mr. Leisinger to conduct his examination and comparison, provided that: (a) the defendants waive any objections to the chain of custody of the above-listed items of evidence from the time they are provided to Mr. Leisinger through and including the time they are in Ms possession; and (b) the New Jersey State Police, Ballistics Unit, be permitted to observe Mr. Leisinger as he handles the above-listed items of evidence to ensure their safe-keeping.

IT IS, THUS, ON this 30th day of January, 2012.

ORDERED that members of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the New Jersey State Police, Ballistics Unit, will transport the two shell casings recovered from the scene of the robbery and the two shell casings test-fired from firearms recovered from the defendants, respectively, to Mr. Leisinger's office in Ewing, New Jersey, at a mutually convenient date and time, for Mr. Leisinger to conduct his examination and comparison;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that members Of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the New Jersey State Police, Ballistics Unit, will be permitted to observe Mr. Leisinger as he handles the above-listed items of evidence to ensure their safe-keeping; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants Nelson Otero and Maxcime Cagan hereby waive any objections to the chain of custody of the above-listed items of evidence from the time they are provided to Mr. Leisinger through and including the time they are in his possession, and they may not challenge the chain of custody as to these items on that basis at trial.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer