Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

ANDREW v. CENTURY SURETY COMPANY, 2:12-cv-00978-APG-PAL. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20160616e14 Visitors: 11
Filed: Jun. 14, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 14, 2016
Summary: ORDER SUSPENDING BRIEFING ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND REQUIRING BRIEFS ON WHETHER THIS CASE SHOULD BE STAYED ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . On June 13, 2016, defendant Century Surety Company filed a motion for reconsideration of my prior order and a motion to exceed page limit. ECF Nos. 217, 218. On June 1, 2016, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals certified to the Supreme Court of Nevada the follow question of law: "Whether, under Nevada law, the liability of an insurer that has
More

ORDER SUSPENDING BRIEFING ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND REQUIRING BRIEFS ON WHETHER THIS CASE SHOULD BE STAYED

On June 13, 2016, defendant Century Surety Company filed a motion for reconsideration of my prior order and a motion to exceed page limit. ECF Nos. 217, 218.

On June 1, 2016, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals certified to the Supreme Court of Nevada the follow question of law: "Whether, under Nevada law, the liability of an insurer that has breached its duty to defend, but has not acted in bad faith, is capped at the policy limit plus any costs incurred by the insured in mounting a defense, or is the insurer liable for all losses consequential to the insurer's breach?" Nalder v. United Automobile Ins. Co., Ninth Cir. Case No. 13-17441 (ECF No. 39). The Ninth Circuit's order certifying the question refers to some of my decisions in this case. Id. at 7-10. Thus, the answer from the Supreme Court of Nevada, should it accept the certification, likely will have a significant impact on the outcome of this case.

The parties are hereby ordered to review the Ninth Circuit's certification order in Nalder and file a joint or separate briefs about whether this case should be stayed pending an answer from the Supreme Court of Nevada on the certified question. Briefing on the pending motion for reconsideration is temporarily suspended until I determine whether this case should be stayed.

The parties are free to continue their settlement discussions and resolve this matter.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that by June 30, 2016, the parties shall file a joint or separate briefs about whether this case should be stayed pending an answer from the Supreme Court of Nevada on the certified question in Nalder.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer