RODE v. MAC, 2:11-CV-1644-PMP-CWH. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20120131b00
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jan. 30, 2012
Latest Update: Jan. 30, 2012
Summary: ORDER PHILIP M. PRO, District Judge. The Court will not consider Defendant's Motion for Dismissal [21] on an ex parte basis. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall, not later than February 21, 2012, respond to Defendant's Motion for Dismissal. Failure to do so will result in the granting of Defendant's Motion for Dismissal.
ORDER
PHILIP M. PRO, District Judge.
The Court will not consider Defendant's Motion for Dismissal [21] on an ex parte basis.
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall, not later than February 21, 2012, respond to Defendant's Motion for Dismissal. Failure to do so will result in the granting of Defendant's Motion for Dismissal.
Source: Leagle
