ECKERT v. DOUGHERTY, CIV 13-0727 JB/WPL. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. New Mexico
Number: infdco20150826d16
Visitors: 6
Filed: Aug. 25, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 25, 2015
Summary: ORDER 1 JAMES O. BROWNING , District Judge . THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiff's Opposed Motion to Amend Complaint, filed January 30, 2015 (Doc. 75)("Motion"). The Court held a hearing on August 20, 2015. For the reasons stated at the hearing, the Court will deny the Motion. IT IS ORDERED that the Plaintiff's Opposed Motion to Amend Complaint, filed January 30, 2015 (Doc. 75), is denied. FootNotes 1. This Order disposes of the Plaintiff's Opposed Motion to Amend C
Summary: ORDER 1 JAMES O. BROWNING , District Judge . THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiff's Opposed Motion to Amend Complaint, filed January 30, 2015 (Doc. 75)("Motion"). The Court held a hearing on August 20, 2015. For the reasons stated at the hearing, the Court will deny the Motion. IT IS ORDERED that the Plaintiff's Opposed Motion to Amend Complaint, filed January 30, 2015 (Doc. 75), is denied. FootNotes 1. This Order disposes of the Plaintiff's Opposed Motion to Amend Co..
More
ORDER1
JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge.
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiff's Opposed Motion to Amend Complaint, filed January 30, 2015 (Doc. 75)("Motion"). The Court held a hearing on August 20, 2015. For the reasons stated at the hearing, the Court will deny the Motion.
IT IS ORDERED that the Plaintiff's Opposed Motion to Amend Complaint, filed January 30, 2015 (Doc. 75), is denied.
FootNotes
1. This Order disposes of the Plaintiff's Opposed Motion to Amend Complaint, filed January 30, 2015 (Doc. 75). The Court will, however, at a later date issue a Memorandum Opinion more fully detailing its rationale for this decision.
Source: Leagle