Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. HENRIQUEZ, 14 Cr. 230-1 (RWS). (2016)

Court: District Court, S.D. New York Number: infdco20160202914 Visitors: 10
Filed: Jan. 25, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 25, 2016
Summary: SENTENCING OPINION ROBERT W. SWEET , District Judge . On April 16, 2015, Jorge Henriquez ("Henriquez" or the "Defendant") pled guilty to one count of distributing and possessing with intent to distribute heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. 841(b) (1) (C). For the reasons set forth below, Henriquez will be sentenced to six months in prison and three years of supervised release, with the special condition of six months of home detention, subject to the scheduled sentencing hearing on January
More

SENTENCING OPINION

On April 16, 2015, Jorge Henriquez ("Henriquez" or the "Defendant") pled guilty to one count of distributing and possessing with intent to distribute heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(b) (1) (C). For the reasons set forth below, Henriquez will be sentenced to six months in prison and three years of supervised release, with the special condition of six months of home detention, subject to the scheduled sentencing hearing on January 28, 2016. Henriquez is also required to pay a special assessment of $100.

Prior Proceedings

Henriquez was named in a one-count indictment (the "Indictment") filed in the Southern District of New York on April 4, 2014. The first and only count of the Indictment ("Count One") charges that on March 5, 2014, in the Southern District of New York and elsewhere, Henriquez distributed and possessed with intent to distribute heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 812, 841(a)(1), and 841(b) (1) (C), as well as 18 U.S.C. § 2.

The Indictment further indicates that as a result of committing the offenses charged, Henriquez shall forfeit to the United States any property constituting or derived from proceeds of the offenses and any property used or intended to be used to commit or facilitate them.

On April 16, 2015, Henriquez pled guilty as charged, pursuant to a written plea agreement. In it, the parties stipulated to the following:

a. The base offense level for the offense is 16, pursuant to § 2D1.1(c) (12), because the offense involved more than 20 grams but less than 40 grams of crack. [Sic.] b. Assuming the defendant, in a timely manner, clearly demonstrates acceptance of responsibility, to the satisfaction of the Government, through his allocution, and subsequent conduct prior to the imposition of sentence, a three-level reduction will be warranted, pursuant to § 3E1.1(a) and (b). c. In accordance with the above, the applicable Guidelines offense level is 13. d. Based upon the information now available to the Government (including representations by the defense), the defendant has one criminal history point. Accordingly, the defendant's Criminal History Category is I. e. Based upon the calculations set forth above, the defendant's stipulated guidelines range is 12 to 18 months' imprisonment. In addition, after determining the defendant's ability to pay, the Court may impose a fine pursuant to § 5E1.2. The applicable fine range is $3,000 to $1,000,000.

He is scheduled to be sentenced on January 28, 2016.

The Sentencing Framework

In accordance with the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), and the Second Circuit's decision in United States v. Crosby, 397 F.3d 103 (2d Cir. 2005), the sentence to be imposed was reached through consideration of all of the factors identified in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), including the Advisory Guidelines. Thus, the sentence to be imposed here is the result of a consideration of:

(1) the nature and circumstances of the offense and the history and characteristics of the defendant; (2) the need for the sentence imposed — (A) to reflect the seriousness of the offense, to promote respect for the law, and to provide just punishment for the offense; (B) to afford adequate deterrence to criminal conduct; (C) to protect the public from further crimes of the defendant; and (D) to provide the defendant with needed educational or vocational training, medical care, or other correctional treatment in the most effective manner; (3) the kinds of sentences available; (4) the kinds of sentence and the sentencing range established for — (A) the applicable category of offense committed by the applicable category of defendant as set forth in the guidelines . . .; (5) any pertinent policy statement [issued by the Sentencing Commission]; (6) the need to avoid unwarranted sentence disparities among defendants with similar records who have been found guilty of similar conduct; and (7) the need to provide restitution to any victims of the offense.

18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). A sentencing judge is permitted to find all the facts appropriate for determining a sentence, whether that sentence is a so-called Guidelines sentence or not. See Crosby, 397 F.3d at 114-15.

The Defendant

The Court adopts the facts set forth in the Presentence Investigation Report ("PSR") with respect to Defendant's personal and family history.

The Offense Conduct

The Court adopts the facts set forth in the PSR with respect to the offense conduct. These facts are summarized, in brief form, below.

After a tip from a confidential informant that Henriquez was involved in the heroin trade, the government had the informant contact him and attempt to set up a deal. Henriquez agreed to provide a large quantity of heroin, and agents observed him drive to his apartment building, go in, return outside, and place something in the trunk of his vehicle. When agents pulled Henriquez over, he consented to a search, and agents found a plastic bag in the trunk containing 40 bundles of heroin. The government views Henriquez as responsible for distributing 20-40 grams of heroin.

The Relevant Statutory Provisions

The maximum term of imprisonment on Count One is 20 years. 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(C). The minimum term of supervised release is three years and the maximum is life. 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(C). The Defendant is eligible for between one and five years of probation. 21 U.S.C. § 841(b) (1) (C). The maximum fine for Count One is $1,000,000. 21 U.S.C. § 841(b) (1) (C). A special assessment of $100 for each count is mandatory pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3013 (a) (2).

The Guidelines

The November 1, 2015 edition of the United States Sentencing Commission Guidelines Manual has been used in this case for calculation purposes, pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 1B1.11.

The guideline for 21 U.S.C. § 841 offenses is found in U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1. Under U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(c) (2), distribution of between 20 and 40 grams of heroin warrants an offense level of 16.

Defendant has clearly demonstrated acceptance of responsibility for the offense. Accordingly, the offense level is decreased by two. U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1 (a). Defendant has also assisted authorities in the investigation or prosecution of his own misconduct by timely notifying authorities of his intention to enter a plea of guilty. Accordingly, the offense level is decreased by one additional level. U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1 (b). These adjustments result in an offense level of 13.

Henriquez has one prior criminal conviction. On February 9, 2011, he was convicted in New York County Supreme Court of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree and sentenced to three years' probation. Pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 4A1.1(c), this offense warrants one criminal history point. A total of one criminal history point results in a criminal history category of I. See Sentencing Table, U.S.S.G. Ch. 5 Pt. A. Based on a total offense level of 13 and a criminal history category of I, the Guideline range of imprisonment is 12 to 18 months. Pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 5F1.2, home detention may be utilized as a "substitute for imprisonment" for some portion of that period.

The guideline range for a term of supervised release on Count One is one to three years. U.S.S.G. § 5D1.2 (a) (2). Defendant is not eligible for probation because his guideline range falls in Zone C of the Sentencing Table. U.S.S.G. § 5B1.1 application note 2. The fine range for this offense is $5,500 to $1,000,000. U.S.S.G. § 5E1.2 (c) (3,4). Costs of prosecution shall be imposed on the Defendant as required by statute. U.S.S.G. § 5E1.5. In determining whether to impose a fine and the amount of such a fine, the Court shall consider, among other factors, the expected costs to the government of any term of probation, or term of imprisonment and term of supervised release imposed. U.S.S.G. § 5E1.2 (d) (7); 18 U.S.C. § 3572 (a) (6). These costs may include drug and alcohol treatment, electronic monitoring, and/or contract confinement costs. The most recent advisory from the Administrative Office of the United States Courts, dated June 26, 2015, provides a daily cost of $84.00, a monthly cost of $2,552.00, and an annual cost of $30,621.00 for imprisonment.

The Remaining Factors of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)

Having engaged in the Guidelines analysis, this Court also gives due consideration to the remaining factors identified in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) to impose a sentence "sufficient, but not greater than necessary," as is required by the Supreme Court's decision in Booker, 543 U.S. 220, and the Second Circuit's decision in Crosby, 397 F.3d 103. In light of the Court's statutory responsibility "to `impose a sentence sufficient, but not greater than necessary' to accomplish the goals of sentencing," Kimbrough v. United States, 552 U.S. 85, 102 (2007) (quoting 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)), and having considered the Guidelines and all of the factors set forth in § 3553(a), the Court has determined that a Guidelines sentence is warranted.

Although Mr. Henriquez is charged with only one transaction involving a small amount of heroin, the short amount of time between the offense and the end of his term of probation, combined with the fact that his prior drug conviction did not deter him from re-entering the narcotics trade, indicates that he carries a significant risk of recidivism. It is hoped that a term of imprisonment will impress on Henriquez the serious consequences that will follow if he returns to selling drugs once again. That said, the term of imprisonment should be kept relatively brief due to his manifest capacity to support himself and to live a successful life outside the drug trade. A significant, but not overly punitive prison term, to be followed by home detention, which in turn will be followed by supervised release, will hopefully help Mr. Henriquez transition to freedom and lawful employment in stages, with ample supervision by the Probation Department. Henriquez is therefore sentenced to a term of 12 months imprisonment, the bottom of his guidelines range, but a period of home detention will be "substituted" for the latter six months of that term pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 5F1.2.

The Sentence

Henriquez shall be imprisoned for six months on Count One. The term of imprisonment will be followed by three years of supervised release, with a special condition of six months of home detention.

As mandatory conditions of his supervised release, Defendant shall:

(1) Not commit another federal, state, or local crime. (2) Not illegally possess a controlled substance. (3) Not possess a firearm or destructive device. (4) Cooperate in the collection of DNA as directed by the probation officer. (5) Refrain from any unlawful use of a controlled substance, including submitting to drug testing within fifteen days of his placement on supervised release, and two or more unscheduled drug tests thereafter, as directed by the probation officer.

The standard conditions of supervision (1-13) are recommended with the following special conditions:

(1) Defendant shall comply with the conditions of home detention for six months. During this time he will remain at his place of residence except for employment and other activities approved by his probation officer. He will maintain a land-line telephone at his place of business without call forwarding, a modem, caller ID, call waiting, or portable cordless telephones for the home detention period. At the direction of his probation officer, he shall wear an electronic monitoring device and follow electronic monitoring procedures specified by his probation officer. Home detention shall commence on a date to be determined by the probation officer. (2) Defendant shall submit his person, residence, place of business, vehicle, or any other premises under his control to a search on the basis that the probation officer has reasonable belief that contraband or evidence of a violation of the conditions of the release may be found. The search must be conducted at a reasonable time and in a reasonable manner. Failure to submit to a search may be grounds for revocation. Defendant shall inform any other residents that the premises may be subject to search pursuant to this condition. (3) Defendant shall provide the probation officer with access to any requested financial information. (4) Defendant is to report to the nearest Probation Office within 72 hours of release from custody. (5) Defendant is to be supervised by the district of residence.

It is further ordered that Defendant shall pay to the United States a special assessment of $100, which shall be due immediately.

Defendant does not have the ability to pay a fine and so the fine in this case is waived.

Defendant shall forfeit his interest in any property constituting proceeds from the offense to the United States. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2; 18 U.S.C. § 1963(a).

Defendant shall voluntarily surrender himself prior to the beginning of his term of imprisonment.

It is so ordered.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer