Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. HARRY, CR 10-1915 JB. (2013)

Court: District Court, D. New Mexico Number: infdco20130412d88 Visitors: 7
Filed: Apr. 11, 2013
Latest Update: Apr. 11, 2013
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINIONN AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiff's Motion to Coompel Defendant to Comply with Rules 16(b)(1)(B) & (C), filed October 2, 2012 (Doc. 97)("Motion to Compel"). The Court held a hearing on March 29, 2013. 1 At the hearing, the parties informed the Court that the Motion to Compel is moot, because the United States requests, in the Motion to Compel, that the Court order Defendant Myron Harry to produce an expert re
More

MEMORANDUM OPINIONN AND ORDER

JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge.

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiff's Motion to Coompel Defendant to Comply with Rules 16(b)(1)(B) & (C), filed October 2, 2012 (Doc. 97)("Motion to Compel"). The Court held a hearing on March 29, 2013.1 At the hearing, the parties informed the Court that the Motion to Compel is moot, because the United States requests, in the Motion to Compel, that the Court order Defendant Myron Harry to produce an expert report for his forensic science expert from Ohio, but Harry is not intending to call a forensic science exppert from Ohio at trial. See Motion to Compel at 1; Transcript of Hearing at 12:17-13:4 (taken March 29, 2013)(Nayback, Court, Samore). Accordingly, the Court denies the Motion to Compel as moot.

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Commppel Defendant to Comply with Rules 16(b)(1)(B) & (C), filed October 2, 2012 (Doc. 97), is denied.

FootNotes


1. The Court's citations to the transcript of the hearing refer to the court reporter's original, unedited version. Any final transcript may contain slightly differennt page and/or line numbers.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer