U.S. v. HACHMYER, 2:09-CR-29 JCM (LRL). (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20160418844
Visitors: 18
Filed: Apr. 14, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 14, 2016
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . Presently before the court is the government's motion to unseal the case. (Doc. #19). Defendant has not filed a response in opposition. The government seeks to unseal the case because: "[t]he reasons for sealing the case no longer exist." (Doc. #19). The court therefore finds that it is appropriate to unseal the record in this case. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that plaintiff's motion to unseal the record as to all filing
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . Presently before the court is the government's motion to unseal the case. (Doc. #19). Defendant has not filed a response in opposition. The government seeks to unseal the case because: "[t]he reasons for sealing the case no longer exist." (Doc. #19). The court therefore finds that it is appropriate to unseal the record in this case. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that plaintiff's motion to unseal the record as to all filings..
More
ORDER
JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge.
Presently before the court is the government's motion to unseal the case. (Doc. #19). Defendant has not filed a response in opposition. The government seeks to unseal the case because: "[t]he reasons for sealing the case no longer exist." (Doc. #19). The court therefore finds that it is appropriate to unseal the record in this case.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that plaintiff's motion to unseal the record as to all filings in this case (doc. #19) be, and the same hereby, is GRANTED.
Source: Leagle
