Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

MRO Corporation v. Humana Inc., 16-2881. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20190607h73 Visitors: 10
Filed: Jun. 05, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 05, 2019
Summary: ORDER CYNTHIA M. RUFE , District Judge . AND NOW, this 5th day of June 2019, upon consideration of MRO Corporation's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 76], Humana Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 77], and the responses thereto, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. MRO's Motion is DISMISSED AS MOOT, to the extent that MRO has moved to preclude Humana from asserting its sixteenth affirmative defen
More

ORDER

AND NOW, this 5th day of June 2019, upon consideration of MRO Corporation's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 76], Humana Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 77], and the responses thereto, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. MRO's Motion is DISMISSED AS MOOT, to the extent that MRO has moved to preclude Humana from asserting its sixteenth affirmative defense.1 2. MRO's Motion is DENIED, to the extent that MRO has moved to preclude Humana from asserting its fourteenth affirmative defense. 3. Humana's Motion is DENIED.

It is so ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. As provided in the accompanying memorandum opinion, Humana responded that it will withdraw its sixteenth affirmative defense. Humana Inc.'s Resp. in Opp'n to MRO's Mot. for Partial Summ. J. [Doc. No. 80] at 1.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer