Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Davis v. Neven, 2:15-cv-01574-RFB-NJK. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20171229a01 Visitors: 14
Filed: Dec. 28, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 28, 2017
Summary: ORDER RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . Respondents have filed a motion for extension of time (first request) (ECF No. 42). The court grants this motion. Petitioner has filed a proper-person motion to extend prison copywork limit (ECF No. 41). The court denies this motion for two reasons. First, petitioner may not file proper-person motions because counsel represents petitioner. Second, petitioner's request is moot because counsel represents petitioner, and counsel will handle an
More

ORDER

Respondents have filed a motion for extension of time (first request) (ECF No. 42). The court grants this motion.

Petitioner has filed a proper-person motion to extend prison copywork limit (ECF No. 41). The court denies this motion for two reasons. First, petitioner may not file proper-person motions because counsel represents petitioner. Second, petitioner's request is moot because counsel represents petitioner, and counsel will handle any needed photocopying.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that respondents' motion for extension of time (first request) (ECF No. 42) is GRANTED. Respondents will have through February 16, 2018, to file and serve an answer or other response to the first amended petition (ECF No. 29).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's proper-person motion to extend prison copywork limit (ECF No. 41) is DENIED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer