Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

LIGE v. CLARK COUNTY, 2:16-cv-00603-JAD-PAL. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20161014f81 Visitors: 23
Filed: Oct. 12, 2016
Latest Update: Oct. 12, 2016
Summary: ORDER PEGGY A. LEEN , Magistrate Judge . Before the court is Defendant Clark County's Emergency Motion for Protective Order (ECF No. 68), and supporting Declaration (ECF No 69). The motion involves discovery disputes about requests for production of documents and a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition notice served by counsel for Plaintiff. It was filed as an emergency motion because the Rule 30(b)(6) notice is set for October 18, 2016. The parties have also applied for and received an extension of the
More

ORDER

Before the court is Defendant Clark County's Emergency Motion for Protective Order (ECF No. 68), and supporting Declaration (ECF No 69). The motion involves discovery disputes about requests for production of documents and a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition notice served by counsel for Plaintiff. It was filed as an emergency motion because the Rule 30(b)(6) notice is set for October 18, 2016. The parties have also applied for and received an extension of the discovery plan and scheduling order deadlines. See Stipulation and Order (ECF Nos. 66, 70). Having reviewed the matter,

IT IS ORDERED that:

1. A temporary protective order is entered precluding the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition set for October 18, 2016 from going forward as scheduled pending a decision on the merits. 2. A hearing on the Emergency Motion for Protective Order (ECF No. 68) is scheduled for November 17, 2016 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 3B.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer