Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

McCarty v. US Bancorp, 2:18-cv-00732-RFB-NJK. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180706985 Visitors: 13
Filed: Jul. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 05, 2018
Summary: Order (Docket No. 18) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's proposed discovery plan and scheduling order. Docket No. 18. Plaintiff submits that the parties held their Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(f) conference on June 8, 2018. Id. at 2. Although Plaintiff submits that the parties exchanged various unpleasantries, it appears that they nonetheless discussed certain aspects of the discovery plan. Id. at 6-7. Local Rule 26-1(a) requires that the parties must submi
More

Order

(Docket No. 18)

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's proposed discovery plan and scheduling order. Docket No. 18.

Plaintiff submits that the parties held their Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(f) conference on June 8, 2018. Id. at 2. Although Plaintiff submits that the parties exchanged various unpleasantries, it appears that they nonetheless discussed certain aspects of the discovery plan. Id. at 6-7. Local Rule 26-1(a) requires that the parties must submit a stipulated discovery plan.

Accordingly, the Court DENIES without prejudice Plaintiff's proposed discovery plan. Docket No. 18. The Court ORDERS the parties to conduct a second Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(f) conference and file a joint proposed discovery plan no later than July 16, 2018.

The Court reminds the parties that it expects, and that Fed.R.Civ.P. 1 requires, the cooperation of parties in securing "the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding."

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer