BARABIN v. ASTENJOHNSON, INC., C07-1454JLR. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Washington
Number: infdco20171113673
Visitors: 4
Filed: Nov. 03, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 03, 2017
Summary: ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RELIEF AS MOOT JAMES L. ROBART , District Judge . Before the court is Plaintiff Geraldine Barabin's motion for relief from the court's order denying an extension of the discovery deadline. (Mot. (Dkt. # 651).) Ms. Barabin sought relief so that Dr. Carl Brodkin, an expert witness, could be deposed on December 19, 2017, because he was not available for deposition before the November 26, 2017, discovery cutoff date. ( See generally id. ; 3/29/2017 Sched. Order (Dkt. #
Summary: ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RELIEF AS MOOT JAMES L. ROBART , District Judge . Before the court is Plaintiff Geraldine Barabin's motion for relief from the court's order denying an extension of the discovery deadline. (Mot. (Dkt. # 651).) Ms. Barabin sought relief so that Dr. Carl Brodkin, an expert witness, could be deposed on December 19, 2017, because he was not available for deposition before the November 26, 2017, discovery cutoff date. ( See generally id. ; 3/29/2017 Sched. Order (Dkt. # 6..
More
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RELIEF AS MOOT
JAMES L. ROBART, District Judge.
Before the court is Plaintiff Geraldine Barabin's motion for relief from the court's order denying an extension of the discovery deadline. (Mot. (Dkt. # 651).) Ms. Barabin sought relief so that Dr. Carl Brodkin, an expert witness, could be deposed on December 19, 2017, because he was not available for deposition before the November 26, 2017, discovery cutoff date. (See generally id.; 3/29/2017 Sched. Order (Dkt. # 643).) However, in Ms. Barabin's reply, she indicated that Dr. Brodkin "has been able to make November 10, 2017 available for deposition and the defendants have accepted this date for Dr. Brodkin's deposition." (Reply (Dkt. # 653) at 2.) Ms. Barabin concedes that "relief will no longer be necessary," assuming that this deposition proceeds as scheduled. (Id.) She offers no reason to suggest that Dr. Brodkin's deposition would not occur as currently scheduled. (See generally id.)
Because Dr. Brodkin is now scheduled to be deposed before the discovery cutoff, the relief sought by Ms. Barabin — to allow Dr. Brodkin's deposition to occur after the discovery deadline — is no longer needed. Accordingly, the court DENIES Ms. Barabin's motion for relief as moot (Dkt. # 651).
Source: Leagle
