Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

VONGSOUVANH v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 6:13-CV-1581.(TJM/ATB) (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. New York Number: infdco20150305b61 Visitors: 5
Filed: Mar. 03, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2015
Summary: DECISION & ORDER THOMAS J. McAVOY , Senior District Judge . This matter was referred to the Hon. Andrew T. Baxter, United States Magistrate Judge, for a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b) and Rule 72.3(d) of the Local Rules of the Northern District of New York. In a Report-Recommendation dated February 10, 2015, Magistrate Judge Baxter recommended that the decision of the Commissioner be reversed and the matter be remanded to the Commissioner pursuant to sentence four
More

DECISION & ORDER

This matter was referred to the Hon. Andrew T. Baxter, United States Magistrate Judge, for a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Rule 72.3(d) of the Local Rules of the Northern District of New York. In a Report-Recommendation dated February 10, 2015, Magistrate Judge Baxter recommended that the decision of the Commissioner be reversed and the matter be remanded to the Commissioner pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for a proper evaluation of the medical and other evidence, an appropriate determination of plaintiff's residual functional capacity, and other further proceedings consistent with further proceedings consistent with his Report-Recommendation. No objections to the Report — Recommendation have been lodged and the time for filing objections has expired.

CONCLUSION

After examining the record, this Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice. Therefore, the Court ADOPTS the Report-Recommendation [dkt. # 15] for the reasons stated therein, and the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and the matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for a proper evaluation of the medical and other evidence, an appropriate determination of plaintiff's residual functional capacity, and other further proceedings consistent with Magistrate Judge Baxter's Report-Recommendation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer