INTERNATIONAL REHABILITATIVE SCIENCES INC. v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, 12-CV-1225-A. (2014)
Court: District Court, W.D. New York
Number: infdco20141117a57
Visitors: 12
Filed: Nov. 07, 2014
Latest Update: Nov. 07, 2014
Summary: DECISION AND ORDER RICHARD J. ARCARA, District Judge. The above-referenced case was referred to Magistrate Judge Hugh B. Scott, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) for conduct of pretrial proceedings. On August 5, 2014;, Magistrate Judge Scott filed a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 65), recommending that defendant's motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 37) should be granted, and defendant directed to file an answer to the remaining claims in the complaint. The Court has carefully reviewed the Repor
Summary: DECISION AND ORDER RICHARD J. ARCARA, District Judge. The above-referenced case was referred to Magistrate Judge Hugh B. Scott, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) for conduct of pretrial proceedings. On August 5, 2014;, Magistrate Judge Scott filed a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 65), recommending that defendant's motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 37) should be granted, and defendant directed to file an answer to the remaining claims in the complaint. The Court has carefully reviewed the Report..
More
DECISION AND ORDER
RICHARD J. ARCARA, District Judge.
The above-referenced case was referred to Magistrate Judge Hugh B. Scott, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) for conduct of pretrial proceedings. On August 5, 2014;, Magistrate Judge Scott filed a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 65), recommending that defendant's motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 37) should be granted, and defendant directed to file an answer to the remaining claims in the complaint.
The Court has carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation, objections, and the pleadings and materials in the case, and it is hereby
ORDERED, that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and for the reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge Scott's Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 65), defendant's motion to dismiss (Dkt. No 37) is granted and the defendant is directed to file an answer to the remaining claims in the complaint.
The case is recommitted to Magistrate Judge Scott for further proceedings pursuant to the Court's earlier referral (Dkt. No. 27)
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
