GAL v. NYE COUNTY, 2:16-cv-00868-JAD-CWH. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20170213c16
Visitors: 7
Filed: Feb. 10, 2017
Latest Update: Feb. 10, 2017
Summary: ORDER C.W. HOFFMAN, Jr. , Magistrate Judge . Presently before the Court is Plaintiff's motion to compel (ECF No. 39), filed on February 8, 2017. Defendant has not filed a response. Under Local Rule 26-7(b), all motions to compel discovery must set forth in full the text of the discovery originally sought and any response to it. Local Rule 26-7(c) further requires that motions to compel will not be considered unless they include a declaration setting forth the details and results of the mee
Summary: ORDER C.W. HOFFMAN, Jr. , Magistrate Judge . Presently before the Court is Plaintiff's motion to compel (ECF No. 39), filed on February 8, 2017. Defendant has not filed a response. Under Local Rule 26-7(b), all motions to compel discovery must set forth in full the text of the discovery originally sought and any response to it. Local Rule 26-7(c) further requires that motions to compel will not be considered unless they include a declaration setting forth the details and results of the meet..
More
ORDER
C.W. HOFFMAN, Jr., Magistrate Judge.
Presently before the Court is Plaintiff's motion to compel (ECF No. 39), filed on February 8, 2017. Defendant has not filed a response.
Under Local Rule 26-7(b), all motions to compel discovery must set forth in full the text of the discovery originally sought and any response to it. Local Rule 26-7(c) further requires that motions to compel will not be considered unless they include a declaration setting forth the details and results of the meet and confer conference for each disputed discovery request.
Plaintiff has not certified an attempt to meet and confer with Defendant regarding the disputed discovery material. Nor has he provided details of the results of the conference. In order to determine the nature and extent of the dispute, the Court requires a description of each disputed discovery request along with an explanation of the status of the dispute after the meet and confer conferences.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion to compel (ECF No. 39) is DENIED without prejudice.
Source: Leagle
