BOERSMA v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 3:13 CV 380-TC. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Oregon
Number: infdco20140604e93
Visitors: 63
Filed: Jun. 02, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 02, 2014
Summary: ORDER ANN AIKEN, District Judge. Magistrate Judge Coffin filed his Findings and Recommendation on April 25, 2014. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co., Ltd. , 700 F.2d 1202 , 1206 (9th Cir. 1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist. , 708 F.2d 452 , 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having review
Summary: ORDER ANN AIKEN, District Judge. Magistrate Judge Coffin filed his Findings and Recommendation on April 25, 2014. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co., Ltd. , 700 F.2d 1202 , 1206 (9th Cir. 1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist. , 708 F.2d 452 , 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewe..
More
ORDER
ANN AIKEN, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Coffin filed his Findings and Recommendation on April 25, 2014. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, I adopt Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendation.
Source: Leagle
