Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. Bank National Association v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC, 2:17-cv-01485-JCM-PAL. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20171006t36 Visitors: 5
Filed: Sep. 29, 2017
Latest Update: Sep. 29, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO SFR INVESTMENT POOL 1, LLC'S MOTION TO DISMISS (SECOND REQUEST) JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . Plaintiff U.S. Bank National Association and Defendant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC ("SFR"), by and through their respective counsel (collectively the "Parties"), hereby stipulate and agree to extend the time for Plaintiff to respond to SFR's Motion to Dismiss pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6) [ECF Doc. 18] ("Motion"). The Motion was filed August
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO SFR INVESTMENT POOL 1, LLC'S MOTION TO DISMISS

(SECOND REQUEST)

Plaintiff U.S. Bank National Association and Defendant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC ("SFR"), by and through their respective counsel (collectively the "Parties"), hereby stipulate and agree to extend the time for Plaintiff to respond to SFR's Motion to Dismiss pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6) [ECF Doc. 18] ("Motion"). The Motion was filed August 28, 2017. This is the second request for an extension of time to respond to the Motion. The original deadline for responses to the Motion was September 11, 2017. The Parties agreed to extend the deadline to October 2, 2017 [ECF Doc. 23]. The Parties have agreed that the new deadline for Plaintiff should be October 9, 2017.

WHEREAS, Plaintiff requires a short extension of time to review the Motion and related documents and evaluate the arguments therein;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff requested, and SFR agreed, to extend the time for Plaintiff to respond to the Motion; and

WHEREAS, this request is not made for purposes of delay and is supported by good cause. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, and for good cause, IT IS

HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the Parties, as follows:

1. Plaintiff shall have until October 9, 2017 to respond to the Motion.

2. SFR shall have until October 30, 2017 to reply in support of the Motion.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer