Mumpton v. Berryhill, 18-cv-201. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. New York
Number: infdco20180830f50
Visitors: 4
Filed: Aug. 29, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 29, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION FOR REMAND DAVID E. PEEBLES , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the attorney for the Defendant and the attorney for the Plaintiff, that this action be, and hereby is, remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g), for further administrative proceedings; and this Court having considered this matter. It is ORDERED that the final decision of the Commissioner be and hereby is REVERSED, and the ma
Summary: STIPULATION FOR REMAND DAVID E. PEEBLES , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the attorney for the Defendant and the attorney for the Plaintiff, that this action be, and hereby is, remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g), for further administrative proceedings; and this Court having considered this matter. It is ORDERED that the final decision of the Commissioner be and hereby is REVERSED, and the mat..
More
STIPULATION FOR REMAND
DAVID E. PEEBLES, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the attorney for the Defendant and the attorney for the Plaintiff, that this action be, and hereby is, remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further administrative proceedings; and this Court having considered this matter.
It is ORDERED that the final decision of the Commissioner be and hereby is REVERSED, and the matter is REMANDED pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to the Defendant for further administrative action, and it is further
The Clerk is directed to enter judgment. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993).
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
