Filed: Mar. 06, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 06, 2018
Summary: Opinion and Order Not for electronic or print publication ALLYNE R. ROSS , District Judge . This Court has received the Report and Recommendation on the instant case dated February 16, 2018, from the Honorable Vera M. Scanlon, United States Magistrate Judge. Objections were due by March 5, 2018, but no objections have been filed. The Court reviews "de novo any part of the magistrate judge's disposition that has been properly objected to." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); see also Brissett v. Manhat
Summary: Opinion and Order Not for electronic or print publication ALLYNE R. ROSS , District Judge . This Court has received the Report and Recommendation on the instant case dated February 16, 2018, from the Honorable Vera M. Scanlon, United States Magistrate Judge. Objections were due by March 5, 2018, but no objections have been filed. The Court reviews "de novo any part of the magistrate judge's disposition that has been properly objected to." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); see also Brissett v. Manhatt..
More
Opinion and Order
Not for electronic or print publication
ALLYNE R. ROSS, District Judge.
This Court has received the Report and Recommendation on the instant case dated February 16, 2018, from the Honorable Vera M. Scanlon, United States Magistrate Judge. Objections were due by March 5, 2018, but no objections have been filed. The Court reviews "de novo any part of the magistrate judge's disposition that has been properly objected to." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); see also Brissett v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Auth., No. 09-CV-874 (CBA)(LB), 2011 WL 1930682, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. May 19, 2011). Where no timely objections have been filed, "the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record." Finley v. Trans Union, Experian, Equifax, No. 17-CV-0371 (LDH)(LB), 2017 WL 4838764, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 24, 2017) (quoting Estate of Ellington ex rel. Ellington v. Harbrew Imports Ltd., 812 F.Supp.2d 186, 189 (E.D.N.Y. 2011)). Having reviewed the record, I find no clear error. I therefore adopt the Report and Recommendation, in its entirety, as the opinion of the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
Accordingly, I grant the plaintiffs' motion for a default judgment, and award them damages in the amount of $25,814.27. I also award them $3.76 in prejudgment interest and $3.76 in liquidated damages for every day from and including October 25, 2016, until judgment is entered.
SO ORDERED.
