Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Romero, CR13-2723RB. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. New Mexico Number: infdco20190614a24 Visitors: 7
Filed: Jun. 13, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 13, 2019
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO PROCEED ON APPEAL WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF COSTS OR FEES ROBERT C. BRACK , Senior District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on Mr. Romero's Motion for Leave to Proceed on Appeal Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit. (Doc. 128.) For the reasons explained below, the Court concludes that Mr. Romero's appeal is not taken in good faith and, therefore, will deny his motion. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), "[a]n appeal may not be taken in
More

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO PROCEED ON APPEAL WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF COSTS OR FEES

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Mr. Romero's Motion for Leave to Proceed on Appeal Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit. (Doc. 128.) For the reasons explained below, the Court concludes that Mr. Romero's appeal is not taken in good faith and, therefore, will deny his motion.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), "[a]n appeal may not be taken in forma pauperis if the trial court certifies in writing that it is not taken in good faith." For purposes of § 1915(a)(3), a good faith appeal is one that presents a "reasoned, nonfrivolous argument on the law and facts in support of the issues raised on appeal." Caravalho v. Pugh, 177 F.3d 1177, 1179 (10th Cir. 1999) (quotations omitted); see also Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 442-50 (1962). In determining good faith, the Court should not decide the merits of the issues on appeal but, instead, should only reach the question of whether the appellant has presented a reasoned and nonfrivolous argument. See Ragan v. Cox, 305 F.2d 58, 59-60 (10th Cir. 1962).

Mr. Romero has failed to identify either the issues he intends to raise on appeal or the existence of a reasoned, nonfrivolous argument on the law and facts to support his proposed appellate issues. (See Docs. 125 (stating that he appeals the "order denying [his] motion to reduce sentence"); 128.) For this reason, as well as the reasons set forth in the Court's April 3, 2019 Memorandum Opinion and Order denying Mr. Romero's motion to reduce sentence (see Doc. 124), the Court will deny Mr. Romero's Application and certify that his appeal is not taken in good faith.

The Court advises Mr. Romero that he may file a motion for leave to proceed on appeal without prepayment of fees in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit within 30 days after service of this Order. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(5). "The motion must include a copy of the affidavit filed in the district court and the district court's statement of reasons for its action." Id.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Motion for Leave to Proceed on Appeal Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit (Doc. 128) is DENIED; the Court CERTIFIES that the appeal is not taken in good faith, and the Court DIRECTS the Clerk of the Court to notify the Court of Appeals of this denial and certification.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer