Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Szuszalski v. Fields, CV 19-250 RB/CG. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. New Mexico Number: infdco20190625d82 Visitors: 7
Filed: Jun. 24, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 24, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL CARMEN E. GARZA , Chief Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff Shannon Szuszalski's Motion and Memorandum to Compel Sandoval County Defendants' Amended Initial Disclosures Pursuant to Rule 26(a)(1) (the "Motion"), (Doc. 44), filed June 5, 2019. Defendants did not file a Response to the Motion and the time for doing so has now passed. See D.N.M.LR-CIV 7.4(a) ("A response must be served and filed within fourteen (14) calendar days
More

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff Shannon Szuszalski's Motion and Memorandum to Compel Sandoval County Defendants' Amended Initial Disclosures Pursuant to Rule 26(a)(1) (the "Motion"), (Doc. 44), filed June 5, 2019. Defendants did not file a Response to the Motion and the time for doing so has now passed. See D.N.M.LR-CIV 7.4(a) ("A response must be served and filed within fourteen (14) calendar days after service of the motion."). In accordance with the local rules, Defendants' failure to respond in opposition to Plaintiff's Motion is viewed as consent for the Court to grant the Motion. See N.M.LR-CIV 7.1(b) ("The failure of a party to file and serve a response in opposition to a motion within the time prescribed for doing so constitutes consent to grant a motion.").

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff Shannon Szuszalski's Motion and Memorandum to Compel Sandoval County Defendants' Amended Initial Disclosures Pursuant to Rule 26(a)(1), (Doc. 44), shall be GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants shall pay all of Plaintiff's attorney fees related to the filing of this Motion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer