STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT

[SECOND REQUEST]

CAM FERENBACH, Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff Jack A. Demay ("Plaintiff"), and Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., erroneously named as America's Servicing Company ("Wells Fargo," together with Plaintiff, the "Parties"), by and through their attorneys, hereby stipulate to extend the time for Wells Fargo to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. This is the Parties second extension request.

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b)(1) and Local Rule 6-1, there exists good cause to grant this extension to respond for the following reasons:

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed the Complaint on April 7, 2017;

WHEREAS, the Parties previously stipulated to extend Wells Fargo's response deadline, and Wells Fargo's response is currently due May 30, 2017.

WHEREAS, Wells Fargo requires additional time to locate, organize, and review the relevant documents and prepare the appropriate response;

WHEREAS, the Parties agreed to the extension requested herein;

WHEREAS this request is not made for purposes of delay and is supported by good cause;

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, and for good cause, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the Parties that Wells Fargo shall respond to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before June 13, 2017.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED THAT Wells Fargo shall respond to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before June 13, 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED.