GARCIA v. SAUERS, 11-CV-3419. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20120504h32
Visitors: 6
Filed: May 01, 2012
Latest Update: May 01, 2012
Summary: ORDER J. CURTIS JOYNER, Chief Judge. AND NOW, this 1 st day of the pleadings and the record herein, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of M. Faith Angell, United States Magistrate Judge and Petitioner's objections thereto (Document 20), it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED. 2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED AND DISMISSED AS TIME BARRED, under 28 U.S.C. 2244(d) (1). There is no probable cause to issue a certifi
Summary: ORDER J. CURTIS JOYNER, Chief Judge. AND NOW, this 1 st day of the pleadings and the record herein, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of M. Faith Angell, United States Magistrate Judge and Petitioner's objections thereto (Document 20), it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED. 2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED AND DISMISSED AS TIME BARRED, under 28 U.S.C. 2244(d) (1). There is no probable cause to issue a certific..
More
ORDER
J. CURTIS JOYNER, Chief Judge.
AND NOW, this 1st day of the pleadings and the record herein, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of M. Faith Angell, United States Magistrate Judge and Petitioner's objections thereto (Document 20), it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED AND DISMISSED AS TIME BARRED, under 28 U.S.C. §2244(d) (1).
There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.
Source: Leagle
