WALKER v. KIRK, 5:16CV00206-JLH-JTK. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20170518a28
Visitors: 24
Filed: May 17, 2017
Latest Update: May 17, 2017
Summary: ORDER J. LEON HOLMES , District Judge . The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, and the timely objections received thereto, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in part, as to defendants CCS and Floss, and DENI
Summary: ORDER J. LEON HOLMES , District Judge . The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, and the timely objections received thereto, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in part, as to defendants CCS and Floss, and DENIE..
More
ORDER
J. LEON HOLMES, District Judge.
The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, and the timely objections received thereto, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly,
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in part, as to defendants CCS and Floss, and DENIED as to defendants Hubbard, Kirk, and Bazzel. Document #64.
IT IS SO RECOMMENDED.
Source: Leagle
