Brown v. Colvin, C15-1465RSM. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Washington
Number: infdco20160422g61
Visitors: 3
Filed: Apr. 21, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 21, 2016
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION RICARDO S. MARTINEZ , Chief District Judge . The Court, after careful consideration of the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of the Honorable Brian A. Tsuchida, United States Magistrate Judge, Plaintiff's Objections thereto, and the Commissioner's Response to those Objection, along with the balance of the record, does hereby find and ORDER : 1) The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation ("R&R"), and the Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED. Plai
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION RICARDO S. MARTINEZ , Chief District Judge . The Court, after careful consideration of the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of the Honorable Brian A. Tsuchida, United States Magistrate Judge, Plaintiff's Objections thereto, and the Commissioner's Response to those Objection, along with the balance of the record, does hereby find and ORDER : 1) The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation ("R&R"), and the Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED. Plain..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ, Chief District Judge.
The Court, after careful consideration of the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of the Honorable Brian A. Tsuchida, United States Magistrate Judge, Plaintiff's Objections thereto, and the Commissioner's Response to those Objection, along with the balance of the record, does hereby find and ORDER:
1) The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation ("R&R"), and the Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED. Plaintiff has objected to the R&R, arguing that Judge Tsuchida applied the wrong standards in evaluating the Administrative Law Judge's underlying decision. Dkt. #24. However, Plaintiff essentially reiterates the arguments made in her opening brief in support of that assertion. Judge Tsuchida has already reviewed and rejected those arguments, and nothing Plaintiff offers now persuades the Undersigned that the R&R is in error. Judge Tsuchida repeatedly noted where Plaintiff's legal authority and argument were lacking, and provided legal accurate authority supporting his conclusions. See, e.g., Dkt. #23 at 3 and 8. Plaintiff's Objections do not correct her deficiencies or provide any authority requiring that Judge Tsuchida's conclusions be rejected. Accordingly, the Undersigned adopts the R&R.
2) The Clerk shall provide copies of this Order to the parties and Judge Tsuchida.
Source: Leagle
