NOEL L. HILLMAN, District Judge.
WHEREAS, pending before the Court is the motion of Plaintiffs, Trustees of International Union of Painters and Allied Trades District Council 711 Health & Welfare Fund, et al. ("Plaintiffs" or "the Funds"), for default judgment against Defendant, Paper Master, LLC ("Defendant"), for unpaid contributions, statutory interest on the unpaid contributions, contractual liquidated damages, contractual penalties, and reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred by Plaintiffs pursuant to 29 U.S.C. §§ 185(a) and 1132(g)(2); and
WHEREAS, Section 515 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1145, provides that "[e]very Employer who is obligated to make contributions to a multiemployer plan . . . under the terms of a collectively bargained agreement shall . . . make such contributions in accordance with . . . such agreement"; and
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs claim that from January 1, 2014, through December 31, 2016, Defendant failed to make $44,076.23 in required fringe benefit contributions to the Funds; and
WHEREAS, as provided by the Policy for the Collection of Delinquent Contributions ("the Collection Policy"),
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Collection Policy, Defendant owes 20% of the principal amount that was due in liquidated damages plus $20 per Fund to which contributions were delinquent, which yielded the combined amount of $8,975.25; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Collection Policy, Defendant owes 20% of the principal amount that was due in delinquent penalties, which yielded the amount of $8,815.25; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Collection Policy, Defendant also owes $373.50 for the cost of the audit; and
WHEREAS, the total of the above figures is $63,814.26;
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs calculate reasonable attorneys' fees and costs to be $1,059.25; and
WHEREAS, therefore, Plaintiffs seek judgment against Defendant in the amount of $64,873.51; and
WHEREAS, Defendant, through its registered agent Richard Kitrick, Esq., was served with Plaintiffs' complaint on January 10, 2019;
WHEREAS, Defendant failed to file an answer or otherwise appear, and on April 9, 2019, the Clerk granted Plaintiffs' request for the entry of default against Defendant pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a); and
WHEREAS, because Defendant still has not appeared in this action, Plaintiffs have filed the instant motion for default judgment against Defendant pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b); and
WHEREAS, although every "well-pled allegation" of the complaint, except those relating to damages, are deemed admitted,
WHEREAS, the decision to enter a default judgment is left to the Court's discretion, but "`in exercising its discretion, the trial court must consider three factors: 1) whether the plaintiff will be prejudiced if the default is lifted; 2) whether the defendant has a meritorious defense; and 3) whether the default was the result of the defendant's culpable misconduct.'"
WHEREAS, with regard to the second two factors, the Court finds that because Defendant was properly served but has failed to appear in this action, it is unknown whether Defendant has a meritorious defense to Plaintiffs' claims, and the inference is that Defendant's default was the result of its own culpable misconduct; and
WHEREAS, with regard to the first factor, the Court finds that Plaintiffs will be prejudiced if default judgment is not entered against Defendant, because under ERISA, a plan is still required to pay benefits to participants regardless of whether an employer makes its contributions to the plan, and "[i]f the plan at issue is part of a multi-employer contribution system, as here, any delinquent contributions owed by a covered employer impairs the plan's ability to pay both the beneficiaries of the delinquent employer as well as employees of companies who have made their contributions."
WHEREAS, if an employer fails to make the contributions as required by the collective bargaining agreement and § 515, then the employer is subject to the provisions of Section 502(g)(2) of ERISA, 29 U.S.C. § 1132(g)(2), which provides for the mandatory award of the following if a judgment under Section 515 is entered in the Fund's favor:
WHEREAS, the Court finds that Plaintiffs have provided competent documentation to support their demand under 29 U.S.C. §§ 185(a) and 1132(g)(2) for unpaid contributions ($44,076.23), statutory interest ($1,574.03), contractual liquidated damages ($8,975.25), reasonable attorneys' fees and costs ($1,059.25), and contractual penalties ($8,815.25);
THEREFORE, IT IS on this
ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion for Default Judgment (Docket Item 7) be, and the same hereby is,